Damian as Antony

When is it a bad time to bring up Damian’s turn at Shakespeare? Why, never, of course! We’ve yet to see him live in a Shakespeare production, but, thanks to The Guardian’s video series, we got the next best thing.

Here’s Damian reading Marc Antony’s “Friends, Romans, countrymen” speech from Julius Caesar for The Guardian’s video series Shakespeare Solos.  And what a rich two and a half minutes of perfection is Damian as Antony!


The short clips provided by the series are a great delivery mechanism for what would otherwise be too much to manage, both in the huge investment to stage and for audiences who are increasingly determined to get their entertainment in bits and pieces, clicks here and there, and impatient with big art that makes you think. And what a wonder that clipping up Shakespeare as The Guardian does in these performance videos actually works! Would it work as well with other drama, you have to wonder? Shakespeare, I think, is unique. In Shakespeare, we get so much of our emotional life writ on paper, put on stage, sent to film, to our screens, making absolute sense that it be transmitted now to our desks and to our pockets. All for the purpose of giving us a window into our own emotional lives. These people, these words, are a vehicle to ourselves, the catalyst to our empathy. Watching them, really watching and listening, brings us more awareness of ourselves and allows us to better know our neighbors, near and far.

On to the speech, with, first, some context from my own memory of reading the play, knowing the story, and more recently, from the excellent HBO series, Rome. 🙂 In this speech Antony is speaking before the man who first drew the blow to murder Caesar, sent the dagger into his belly, and to the rest of the Roman Senate who joined in, mob style, to strike their own blows on the dying Caesar. All of this while Antony was powerless to stop it and obligated to resolve himself to the inevitability of what had to happen. So he speaks, not taking sides, a part of him understanding why the Senate did what it did to finally oust and destroy a ruler who was getting too big. (Caesar had become a dictator, dictator perpetuo, and the Senate was afraid the Republic would fall. Never mind that the Republic would fall anyway, Caesar or no Caesar.)

Antony was Caesar’s closest friend, he was his go-to guy. On the one hand, Antony wants to protect his own ass in this speech by not angering the Senate with too passionate a defense of the man they just ousted by murder. On the other hand, he wants to honor and mourn his friend.

Damian starts Antony’s speech with a mild smile, conciliatory, apologetic even, showing empathy for the murderers. Whenever I read Shakespeare I sort of translate in my head to colloquial language. Indulge me please as I do so to translate this speech: I’ll leave Shakespeare’s actual words in quotes, and everything else is my paraphrasing.

Antony starts: Caesar was evil, they all know, and his evil will live on, but whatever goodness he had will be buried with him. That’s the way of the world. “So let it be with Caesar.” Subtext (which we won’t know till the end of the speech): Yes, I’ll agree with what you did, but not before I remind ya’ll that the guy wasn’t all that bad.

The noble Brutus hath told you that Caesar was ambitious.

Yep, he was, and that sucked. But, sure, fine.

Brutus is an honorable man, so are they all honorable men.

Pause and tone switch.

He was my friend, faithful and just to me.

Damian shows us Antony’s love for Caesar with his eyes. Ironic, perhaps, because Shakespeare, as it’s often on stage, is usually not played with the eyes. But Damian can’t really help it. His voice and his eyes are inextricably bound. He repeats:

But Brutus says he was ambitious, and Brutus is an honorable man.

Here, Damian’s voice and eyes have become just a touch colder. He goes on: Caesar filled your coffers with loot, assuring all members of this nation wealth and prosperity. He wept for the poor and tried to assure that they’d be fed.

Ambition should be made of sterner stuff, but Brutus said he was ambitious and Brutus is an honorable man.

Anger is rising to the surface. Antony says: You all remember me trying to present him with a crown, right? Three times? And he refused it? All three times.

Was this ambition? Yet Brutus says he was ambitious, and, sure, he is an honorable man.

This is the fourth time he’s repeated the same phrase. Good old Willy Shakes loved patterns and symmetry, didn’t he? Anger has now reached the surface. There’s rage in the eyes, and the lines are delivered through gritted teeth. But let me check the anger, his face says. I’m not here to argue against what Brutus said or doubt his inherent honor. But, let me tell ya’ll what I “do know.” You all are the ones who named him leader in perpetuity. You all are the ones who wanted to crown him king.

You all did love him once. Not without cause.

You all had reason to love him and to support him. So why not cry now that he is gone? Why not mourn for him now? You all have become animals wanting to tear him limb from limb and to defend his murderers!


You’re not thinking!

Men have lost their reason.

Damian takes the anger to the very edge. Then: Hold on, let me pull this back. Damian’s smiling non-smile says: Sorry to lose my cool there for a hot minute.

Bear with me. My heart is in the coffin. There with Caesar. And I must pause till it come back to me.

My friend is dead and it hurts deeply. I need a minute. Antony out.

Granted, this is one of Shakespeare’s simpler speeches. Quite easy to dissect and understand the words and see the patterns: The repetitions, the counterpoint of the murderers’ “reason” vs Antony’s “heart”. Even the subtext is pretty obvious if you know the relationships and the story. And, many actors have spoken these words. (The internet tells me 11 actors have played Antony on film alone) There is no doubt of the structural soundness of the words. So, it’s solely the emotion behind the words which has varied from actor to actor. Some actors have bellowed the anger, letting their thunderous lungs do all the work. Some have twitched their mouths or shed a tear at the grief.

Damian neither bellowed nor cried. You see what he did here, right? He used the closeness of the camera to great effect to deliver the anger in increments. He took the repetitions and scaled his release of the anger accordingly. Sort of like a chemical titration, where one liquid is slowly, drop by drop, added to another, until just the perfect moment when the indicator liquid changes color and the reaction has reached an endpoint. Okay, that maybe a stretchy metaphor but it’s the thing that comes to mind when describing such a delivery. I guess I mean to say, he played the anger quite scientifically, governed by “reason”. Then for the grief, the “heart” part of the speech, he plays it as the undercurrent flowing beneath all the words, with his eyes and by letting his voice go soft.

Hell, yes, Damian Lewis needs to do more Shakespeare. On stage, on screen, or even a succession of little bites such as this one speech from Julius Caesar. He needs to do anything and everything, where he is afforded the space to play the full spectrum of emotional truths Shakespeare wrote for us.

We saw a taste of Damian playing Richard Burton playing Antony at a reading of Lawrence Wright’s yet-to-be-staged Cleo. Not much Shakespeare in that story, but, still, a connection, however tangential, between Damian and the Bard.

Indeed, Damian can do romance, comedy, he can do drama, and let’s not even think about him rocking a kilt as Macbeth. Here’s to the lot of us being around in 40 years time or however long it is until Damian eventually plays my absolute favorite of the canon, King Lear, as every great actor must.


10 thoughts on “Damian as Antony”

  1. And redheads gray beautifully so he would be a gorgeous Lear! I was watching this speech on Youtube out of the blue yesterday and I think you’ve brought up some very interesting points about his technique. I love that he brings a modernity to the language without losing the poetry. Thank you for this!

    1. Absolutely! Love your handle. 🙂

      Shakespeare is actually quite accessible and not nearly as scary as folks seem to think. It just needs to be wrapped up in the right voice and a performer who knows what of he speaks. In English class, we were always tasked with reading Shakespeare aloud, and, after a while of reading and hearing each other read, there was this remarkable thing that happened that made the language just click. No matter how modern your intonations and non-language expression, the language sings thru. It’s like a zone you enter. And Damian definitely knows that zone well, as evidenced by his reading this speech. 🙂

      1. I want to second JaniaJania as an immigrant whose native language is not English and who has not read any Shakespeare Shakespeare in English until she moved to the US as a 23 year old young woman. It is not that inaccessible for anyone; you just get into it over time if you really want to get into it. And once you are in, you do not want to get out at all. It is magic! Oh God, I just hope to get old and see that Lear on stage as an old lady and write a review here. My pipedream <3

      2. Haha! I warned Damianista I was going to change from simply Mel, which I thought was boring, even though I am just …Mel. Hee. I am having so much fun here!

  2. Damian acts in such a powerful and compelling way… he truly is as you describe, says things without actually saying, his microgestures are supreme; the tone of his voice and his body language are great. I’d love to see him play on stage King Lear.

  3. Perhaps that is why so many Americans, particularly young Americans, feel intimidated by the Bard. There is a mental block going in because it is elevated language and “intellectual,” though of course Shakespeare was writing just as much for the rabble as the Queen. American teenagers are usually taught Shakespeare by a harried, overtaxed teacher who is pressured by the administration for his/her class to test well. There’s no time to revel in the language. An immigrant might need to ponder every word at first. A slow, glorious osmosis that fuels an appreciation that sadly is dwindling in the States.

    1. Gyaaaah! Finally linked WorkPress to an email JUST for my Damian Lewis shenanigans! Hopefully now my “name” will be consistent. And to keep this on Shakespeare…I THINK I have a copy of the Ralph Fiennes Hamlet program. I wasn’t there but I collect all things Hamlet. This weekend I will see if I can find and scan it.

    2. I was an American teenager (and also an immigrant :)) who seemed to have had a series of great English teachers growing up. Helped, I guess, to also be in love with language from the get-go.

      Shakespeare is actually the opposite of “elevated” language. It was considered downright street back in that day. 🙂

      1. Sadly it seems elevated to southern American students. Our public school systems do little to insure they can read and write even at the most rudimentary level. Happily my mother was a great reader. I started reading plays fairly young and that passion has continued. I did have a wonderful literature teacher in senior year. We had to do book reports on English writers. I suppose that fueled my interest in all things British. 🙂 University was a dream for me. I was an English minor.

Join the conversation!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.